PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies· 2026Q1

The Defensorium unitatis christianae (1450) and the ethical-rational royal absolutism

Héctor Javier García Fuentes

Short summary

Alfonso de Cartagena's Defensorium unitatis christianae (1450) and Pablo de Santa María's Scrutinium Scripturarum reveal a Thomist tradition and exegetical approach within Catholic dogma.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The Defensorium unitatis christianae and Scrutinium Scripturarum are linked by Thomist tradition and exegesis within Catholic dogma.
  • Cartagena's work demonstrates the deontological dimension of faith and its intertwining with law.
  • The concept of 'ethical-rational royal absolutism' is proposed as a designation for Theological Law within Scholastic Humanism.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Firstly, this article aims to highlight the links between Alfonso de Cartagena’s Defensorium unitatis christianae and Pablo de Santa María’s Scrutinium Scripturarum, with a view, on the one hand, to shedding light on the Thomist tradition that underpins both treatises, and, on the other, to stressing the exegetical nature of these works, framed within Catholic dogma (fides). Secondly, drawing on other works by Cartagena, this paper reflects on the deontological dimension of fides and its relationship with the law, and provides evidence confirming the intertwining of these two dimensions in Cartagena’s thought. In this way, the basic parameters of this Theological Law are outlined, and the category of ethical-rational royal absolutism, within the framework of Scholastic Humanism, is proposed as its designation.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Medieval Iberian Studies, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Philosophy

PhilosophyArts and Humanities