International Journal of Architectural Heritage· 2026Q1
Methodology for Modeling and Seismic Analysis of Four Buildings Representative of Bagan’s Monumental Heritage
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new methodology uses nonlinear FE models of Bagan's historic brick masonry monuments to assess seismic vulnerability, revealing that plan symmetry and vertical continuity of the main spire are key to satisfactory seismic performance.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Developed nonlinear FE models of four representative Bagan monuments using digital scans and historical brick masonry constitutive models.
- Assessed seismic performance via nonlinear static pushover and nonlinear dynamic time-history analyses.
- Replicated past earthquake damage using 2016 Chauk earthquake records and simulated higher PGA signals.
- Identified plan symmetry and vertical continuity of the main spire as crucial features for satisfactory seismic performance.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive methodology for assessing the seismic vulnerability of four historic monuments in Bagan, including analysis of their architectural and structural characteristics, an evaluation of their behavior in past earthquakes, and finally finite element (FE) modeling and seismic analysis. The monuments, Myin-pya-gu (1493), Zan-thi (east) (558), Tha-mu-ti-hpaya (844), and Kya-zin-hpaya (1219), are representative of the main structural typologies in Bagan under the scope of the Repair and Seismic Retrofitting of Monuments component of the Bagan Conservation Project. They are defined by the presence or absence of two key features for satisfactory seismic performance: plan symmetry and vertical continuity of the main spire. Nonlinear FE models were developed based on 3D meshes generated from digital scans, incorporating nonlinear constitutive model reflecting Bagan’s historical brick masonry. Seismic performance was assessed through a combination of mass- and mode-proportional nonlinear static pushover analyses. Additionally, nonlinear dynamic time-history analyses were conducted to replicate past damage using natural and physics-based simulated records of the 2016 Chauk earthquake, as well as simulated signals with higher PGA to understand behavior under larger earthquakes. The rationale for the selection of pushover load patterns and ground motion signals for nonlinear static and dynamic analyses, respectively, is discussed highlighting the need to select the nature of analysis based on the exigencies of the structure being modelled.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Civil and Structural Engineering
Civil and Structural EngineeringEngineering