Medicina· 2026Q2· Review
Melatonin in Musculoskeletal and Spine-Related Conditions: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Evidence
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A systematic review of 208 studies (23 in vitro, 142 animal, 43 human) found that while preclinical research suggests melatonin has osteogenic, chondroprotective, and anti-inflammatory effects relevant to musculoskeletal and spine conditions, human evidence is limited, heterogeneous, and methodologically flawed, preventing any current recommendations for its use.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Preclinical studies (23 in vitro, 142 animal) suggest melatonin may promote bone formation, protect cartilage, and reduce inflammation in musculoskeletal and spine conditions.
- Some preclinical findings indicate potential negative effects, including impaired fracture remodeling at high doses and MT2-dependent heterotopic ossification.
- Human evidence (43 reports) is limited, heterogeneous, and frequently exhibits methodological weaknesses.
- No specific melatonin formulation, dose, or route of administration can be recommended for disease modification, neurological recovery, or tissue regeneration based on current evidence.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Experimental studies suggest that melatonin can influence antioxidant, inflammatory, mitochondrial, and chronobiological pathways relevant to musculoskeletal degeneration, repair, and selected spine-related conditions, but clinical translation remains uncertain. This systematic review evaluated primary in vitro, animal, and human evidence concerning exogenous parent melatonin in these conditions. Materials and Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE and Europe PMC were searched from inception to 6 August 2026; ClinicalTrials.gov was mapped separately. Eligible reports were peer-reviewed comparative primary investigations. One reviewer performed screening, extraction, and a screen-level methodological limitation assessment, followed by a complete consistency pass; no automation tools were used. Complete articles were consulted where accessible, but access status was not logged prospectively and the exact number accessed cannot be reconstructed reliably. Because quantitative pooling was not appropriate, evidence was synthesized by stream and clinical domain according to PRISMA 2020 and SWiM. The review was not registered, and no standalone protocol was prepared. Results: The searches yielded 3201 records and 1646 unique records after deduplication. Of 437 reports taken forward for retrieval and report-level assessment using available information, 208 were included (23 in vitro, 142 animal, and 43 human reports). Preclinical studies generally reported osteogenic, chondroprotective, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, mitochondrial, and tissue-repair effects, but findings were not uniformly favorable: high-dose fracture-remodeling impairment and MT2-dependent heterotopic ossification were reported. Human evidence was limited, heterogeneous, and showed frequent screen-level methodological limitations. Formulations, routes, and exposures were non-equivalent. Conclusions: Melatonin is biologically plausible but clinically unproven in the reviewed conditions. No formulation, dose, or route can presently be recommended for disease modification, neurological recovery, or tissue regeneration.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Medicina, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
Endocrine and Autonomic SystemsNeuroscience