PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Pediatrics· 2026Q1

Development of a clinical prediction model for parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort study

Yu-Syuan Chen, Shan-Ming Chen

Short summary

A clinical prediction model for parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis (PNAC) in preterm infants achieved an AUC of 0.859, identifying lower birth weight (BW), treated patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), maximum amino acid (maxAA) dosage, and delayed enteral feeding as key risk factors.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Lower birth weight (≤ 1375 g), treated PDA, maximum amino acid dosage (≥ 4.01 g/kg/day), and delayed enteral feeding (< 25 mL/kg/day on Day 14) are independent predictors of PNAC.
  • The developed predictive model achieved an AUC of 0.859, indicating high diagnostic accuracy.
  • The model demonstrated clinical utility, outperforming 'treat-all' and 'treat-none' strategies within a threshold probability range of 0% to 45%.
  • The study included 329 preterm infants (GA < 37 weeks, BW < 2000 g) requiring PN for ≥ 14 days, excluding those with NEC or major GI surgery.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background Parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis (PNAC) remains a severe and potentially life-threatening complication in preterm infants requiring extended parenteral nutrition. This study aimed to identify independent risk factors for PNAC and develop a robust predictive model to guide clinical decision-making. Methods This retrospective study reviewed medical records of preterm infants admitted to a tertiary NICU between July 2020 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria comprised a gestational age (GA) < 37 weeks, birth weight (BW) < 2000 g, and a requirement for parenteral nutrition (PN) for ≥ 14 consecutive days. Infants diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or those who underwent major gastrointestinal surgery were excluded. Out of 389 screened neonates, 329 met the criteria and were included in the final analysis. Demographic, clinical, and comprehensive nutritional parameters were analyzed. Following collinearity diagnostics to ensure model stability, multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify independent risk factors. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, bootstrap internal validation, subgroup analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results Among 329 included preterm infants, 41 (12.5%) developed PNAC. After adjusting for confounders, multivariable logistic regression identified lower BW, treated patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), maximum amino acid (maxAA) dosage, and Day 14 enteral feeding volume (Day 14 EF) < 25 mL/kg/day as independent predictors of PNAC. The predictive model demonstrated excellent discriminative performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.859 (95% CI: 0.806–0.912, p < 0.001). At the optimal logit cutoff of -2.720, sensitivity was 85.4% and specificity was 77.1%. Individual optimal thresholds were ≤ 1375 g for BW (sensitivity: 69.4%, specificity: 82.9%) and ≥ 4.01 g/kg/day for maxAA (sensitivity: 48.8%, specificity: 83.0%). DCA demonstrated that the model consistently maintained a higher net benefit than “treat-all” and “treat-none” strategies within a threshold probability range of 0% to 45%. Conclusion Lower BW, treated PDA, higher maxAA dosage (4.01 g/kg/day), and delayed enteral feeding (Day 14 EF < 25 mL/kg/day) are independent risk factors for PNAC. The validated predictive model offers high diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility in guiding targeted prevention and management strategies.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Pediatrics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Nutrition and Dietetics

Nutrition and DieteticsNursing