PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Critical Inquiry in Language Studies· 2021Q1

Rejecting abyssal thinking in the language and education of racialized bilinguals: A manifesto

Ofelia Garcı́a, Nelson Flores, Kate Seltzer, Li Wei et al.

Short summary

Racialized bilingual learners draw from rich linguistic, cultural, and historical repertoires, challenging colonial raciolinguistic ideologies that distort and erase their knowledge and abilities.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Rejects "abyssal thinking" that erases marginalized knowledges and lifeways.
  • Adopts an "inside out" perspective for understanding racialized bilinguals.
  • Challenges colonial raciolinguistic ideologies in language and education.
  • Advocates for a translanguaging perspective that embraces diverse repertoires.
  • Proposes a decolonial education centering non-hegemonic "otherwise thinking".

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Following Boaventura de Sousa Santos, the authors of this article reject the type of “abyssal thinking” that erases the existence of counter-hegemonic knowledges and lifeways, adopting instead the “from the inside out” perspective that is required for thinking constructively about the language and education of racialized bilinguals. On the basis of deep personal experience and extensive field-work research, we challenge prevailing assumptions about language, bilingualism, and education that are based on raciolinguistic ideologies with roots in colonialism. Adopting a translanguaging perspective that rejects rigid colonial boundaries of named languages, we argue that racialized bilingual learners, like all students, draw from linguistic-semiotic, cultural, and historical repertoires. The decolonial approach that guides our work reveals these students making a world by means of cultural and linguistic practices derived from their own knowledge systems. We propose that in order to attain justice and success, a decolonial education must center non-hegemonic modes of “otherwise thinking” by attending to racialized bilinguals’ knowledges and abilities that have always existed yet have continually been distorted and erased through abyssal thinking.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 2021 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Linguistics and Language

Linguistics and LanguageSocial Sciences