· 2023
Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts
- 830citations
- 2023year
Short summary
Non-AI experts struggle to design effective prompts for large language models (LLMs), exploring prompt designs opportunistically rather than systematically and encountering barriers like overgeneralization and expectations from human-to-human instruction.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Non-AI experts explored LLM prompt designs opportunistically, not systematically.
- Participants struggled with prompt design in ways similar to end-user programming systems.
- Barriers to effective prompt design included expectations from human-to-human instruction and overgeneralization.
- The study used a design probe, a prototype LLM-based chatbot design tool, to observe participants.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Pre-trained large language models (“LLMs”) like GPT-3 can engage in fluent, multi-turn instruction-taking out-of-the-box, making them attractive materials for designing natural language interactions. Using natural language to steer LLM outputs (“prompting”) has emerged as an important design technique potentially accessible to non-AI-experts. Crafting effective prompts can be challenging, however, and prompt-based interactions are brittle. Here, we explore whether non-AI-experts can successfully engage in “end-user prompt engineering” using a design probe—a prototype LLM-based chatbot design tool supporting development and systematic evaluation of prompting strategies. Ultimately, our probe participants explored prompt designs opportunistically, not systematically, and struggled in ways echoing end-user programming systems and interactive machine learning systems. Expectations stemming from human-to-human instructional experiences, and a tendency to overgeneralize, were barriers to effective prompt design. These findings have implications for non-AI-expert-facing LLM-based tool design and for improving LLM-and-prompt literacy among programmers and the public, and present opportunities for further research.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2023 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Safety Research
Safety ResearchSocial Sciences