PofoliaShared via Pofolia

· 2023

Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts

J.D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian Yang

Short summary

Non-AI experts struggle to design effective prompts for large language models (LLMs), exploring prompt designs opportunistically rather than systematically and encountering barriers like overgeneralization and expectations from human-to-human instruction.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Non-AI experts explored LLM prompt designs opportunistically, not systematically.
  • Participants struggled with prompt design in ways similar to end-user programming systems.
  • Barriers to effective prompt design included expectations from human-to-human instruction and overgeneralization.
  • The study used a design probe, a prototype LLM-based chatbot design tool, to observe participants.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Pre-trained large language models (“LLMs”) like GPT-3 can engage in fluent, multi-turn instruction-taking out-of-the-box, making them attractive materials for designing natural language interactions. Using natural language to steer LLM outputs (“prompting”) has emerged as an important design technique potentially accessible to non-AI-experts. Crafting effective prompts can be challenging, however, and prompt-based interactions are brittle. Here, we explore whether non-AI-experts can successfully engage in “end-user prompt engineering” using a design probe—a prototype LLM-based chatbot design tool supporting development and systematic evaluation of prompting strategies. Ultimately, our probe participants explored prompt designs opportunistically, not systematically, and struggled in ways echoing end-user programming systems and interactive machine learning systems. Expectations stemming from human-to-human instructional experiences, and a tendency to overgeneralize, were barriers to effective prompt design. These findings have implications for non-AI-expert-facing LLM-based tool design and for improving LLM-and-prompt literacy among programmers and the public, and present opportunities for further research.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2023 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Safety Research

Safety ResearchSocial Sciences