Lasers in Medical Science· 2026Q2
Effect of bleaching–remineralization sequence on enamel microhardness and surface properties during laser-assisted bleaching
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Applying remineralization after diode laser-assisted bleaching significantly restores enamel microhardness (VHN) compared to applying it before, without negatively impacting color change (ΔE00) or surface roughness (Ra).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The order of bleaching and remineralization significantly impacts enamel microhardness (VHN) after diode laser bleaching (p < 0.001).
- Remineralization applied after bleaching (post-bleaching) was more effective at restoring microhardness than pre-bleaching application.
- No significant differences in surface roughness (Ra) were observed between sequences, except for a transient increase with fluoride varnish in the pre-bleaching sequence.
- All groups achieved clinically acceptable color changes (ΔE00), with no significant differences between sequences or remineralizing agents.
- SEM/EDS analysis confirmed sequence-dependent surface alterations correlating with microhardness changes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This in vitro study evaluated whether the sequence of bleaching and remineralization procedures and the type of remineralizing agent influence enamel microhardness, surface roughness, and color change following diode laser-assisted bleaching. One hundred twenty human enamel specimens were randomly assigned to two treatment sequences: Bleach-First (BF) and Remineralize-First (RF), each further subdivided into four groups (n = 15) representing different remineralization mechanisms (CPP-ACP–based, calcium–phosphate–magnesium, hydroxyapatite-based, and fluoride varnish). Bleaching was performed using a 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (Whiteness HP, FGM) activated with a 940-nm diode laser (Epic X, Biolase; 7 W, continuous-wave mode; total irradiation time: 120 s). Surface microhardness (VHN; 200 g load for 15 s), surface roughness (Ra), and color (ΔE00) were measured at baseline and after each procedural stage. Data were statistically analyzed using repeated-measures and two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). A significant difference between treatment sequences was observed at the initial stage (p < 0.001), with bleaching reducing and remineralization increasing microhardness. A significant time × sequence interaction (p < 0.001) indicated that these changes depended on the order of application, while no significant main effect of remineralizing agent or sequence × agent interaction was detected (p > 0.05). Surface roughness values showed no significant differences between sequences or agents, except for a transient increase in the fluoride varnish group in the RF sequence. Similarly, all groups exhibited clinically acceptable color change, with no significant differences between sequences or agents. SEM/EDS analyses further revealed sequence-dependent surface alterations, supporting the microhardness findings. The sequence of bleaching and remineralization procedures was identified as the primary factor influencing enamel microhardness, whereas the type of remineralizing agent had no significant effect. Remineralization applied after bleaching appears more effective for restoring enamel microhardness, without affecting surface roughness or color outcomes. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, post-bleaching remineralization demonstrated favorable effects on enamel microhardness without compromising bleaching efficacy.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Lasers in Medical Science, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Orthodontics
OrthodonticsDentistry