Frontiers in Education· 2026Q1
A five-function theory-informed instructional design model for developing clinical reasoning
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new instructional design model, CRAFT, organizes clinical reasoning education around five recurring functions (Conceptualize, Reveal, Apply, Feedback, Transfer) and readiness gates to guide progressive learner development.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The CRAFT model structures clinical reasoning instruction around five distinct functions: Conceptualize, Reveal, Apply, Feedback, and Transfer.
- Readiness gates are proposed within CRAFT to manage progressive learner development through recurring cycles of the five functions.
- The model aims to coordinate conceptual preparation, expert modeling, scaffolded practice, feedback, fading support, and transfer.
- CRAFT is presented as a curricular architecture, illustrated with a sepsis case example, but lacks learner cohort data and requires empirical validation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Clinical reasoning is an iterative, context-sensitive phenomenon. Its instruction and assessment require distinct forms of educational design. Existing reviews, consensus guidance, and longitudinal curricula provide substantial content and teaching strategies. Further specification is needed to coordinate conceptual preparation, expert modeling, scaffolded whole-case practice, feedback, adaptive fading, and transfer across learner development. We present CRAFT, a theory-informed instructional design model organized around five functions: Conceptualize and Frame, Reveal and Model Clinical Reasoning, Apply Through Scaffolded Practice, Feedback and Reflect, and Transfer Toward Independence. CRAFT provides a curricular architecture organized around proposed readiness gates, in which the five functions recur in progressively more demanding cycles as knowledge, contextual variation, uncertainty, learner responsibility, and assessment stakes increase while instructional support decreases. These gates are design criteria for local testing, not validated progression thresholds. We compare CRAFT directly with established instructional approaches and longitudinal clinical-reasoning curricula, define function-specific transition criteria, and formulate five testable propositions linking model components to mechanisms, proximal outcomes, clinical-reasoning performance, and transfer. A multilevel sepsis example illustrates how the same case family could be adapted for learners at different stages. No learner cohort data are reported; the example is an instructional design demonstration, and the evaluation plan is prospective. The model's feasibility, mechanisms, incremental value, and boundary conditions require empirical testing.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Education, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Family Practice
Family PracticeMedicine