Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft· 2026Q2
Generic and subject-specific dimensions of cognitive activation: Assessing the potential of cognitive activation in mathematics and science tasks
- 3citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new coding scheme reliably differentiates generic and subject-specific dimensions of cognitive activation (CA) in math and science tasks, revealing low prevalence of CA across textbook and classroom tasks.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A new coding scheme reliably differentiates generic and subject-specific dimensions of Potential for Cognitive Activation (PCA).
- Low prevalence of task-based PCA dimensions was observed across both textbook (N=380) and classroom (N=5877) math and science tasks.
- Generic and subject-specific PCA dimensions were empirically separable for classroom tasks, but textbook tasks showed a largely unidimensional PCA construct.
- Differences in PCA across school types were not systematic for textbook tasks but varied by task function and subject for classroom tasks.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Cognitive activation (CA) is a key dimension of teaching quality, yet its empirical operationalization remains challenging. This study examines the Potential for Cognitive Activation (PCA) in Grade 9 mathematics and science tasks by differentiating generic and subject-specific dimensions. Building on established coding approaches, we integrated generic and subject-specific dimensions of PCA for application in the large-scale context of the German PISA-Ceco study. Using German textbook tasks ( N = 380) and teacher-used classroom tasks ( N = 5877), distinguishing learning tasks ( N = 966) and exam tasks ( N = 4911), we examined whether theoretically distinguished generic and subject-specific dimensions of PCA can be reliably applied and empirically differentiated within and across mathematics and science tasks. We further investigated differences across subjects, task functions, and school types (Gymnasium vs. lower school tracks). Results indicate high interrater reliability, but reveal a low prevalence of task-based PCA dimensions across subjects and task types. Dimensionality analyses indicated that generic and subject-specific PCA, as captured by the coding scheme, could be empirically separated for classroom tasks, whereas textbook tasks were best represented by an overall, largely unidimensional PCA construct. School-type differences were not systematic in textbook tasks. For classroom tasks, they varied by task function and subject. Overall, the findings provide further insights into the empirical structure of generic and subject-specific PCA and into how potentially cognitively activating task characteristics vary across task types, task functions, school types, and subjects.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Education
EducationSocial Sciences