PLoS ONE· 2026Q1
Photobiomodulation versus stabilization splint, both combined with self-management, for acute temporomandibular myalgia: 48-week outcomes of a partially randomized controlled study
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Photobiomodulation (PBM) combined with self-management (SM) provided comparable 48-week pain relief and improved mouth opening to stabilization splints (OS) with SM for acute temporomandibular myalgia, with both interventions showing earlier improvement than SM alone.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Photobiomodulation (PBM) + self-management (SM) and stabilization splints (OS) + SM yielded similar pain scores (VAS) and maximum painless mouth opening (MPMO) at 48 weeks.
- Both PBM+SM and OS+SM groups showed earlier improvements compared to the SM-only group.
- No significant differences in masticatory muscle tender points were observed between PBM+SM and OS+SM at the 48-week mark.
- The study included 66 patients with DC/TMD-diagnosed acute masticatory muscle pain.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background Photobiomodulation (LLLT) is used for myogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMD), but longer-term comparative evidence versus stabilization splints alongside structured self-management remains limited. This study aims to compare pain reduction and maximum painless mouth opening after photobiomodulation+self-management (PBM + SM) versus stabilization splint+self-management (OS + SM), with an additional self-management–only comparator (SM), over 48 weeks. Methods This partially randomized controlled study enrolled 66 patients with DC/TMD-diagnosed acute masticatory muscle pain. Forty-four participants consenting to intervention were randomized 1:1 to PBM + SM (660-nm diode laser, twice weekly, 10 sessions) or OS + SM (maxillary stabilization splint worn at night, 8 h/day for 2 months). Both intervention groups received the same SM programme (education, habit modification, and jaw exercises for 2 months). A non-randomized convenience group received SM alone (n = 22). Assessments were performed at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48. Primary outcomes were VAS pain (0–10) and maximum painless mouth opening (MPMO, mm). Secondary outcomes included masticatory muscle tenderness and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Longitudinal analyses used linear mixed-effects models. Results All groups improved over time, with earlier improvement in both intervention arms. In the randomized comparison, PBM + SM and OS + SM showed comparable week-48 outcomes for VAS pain and MPMO. No significant between-group difference in masticatory muscle tender points was observed at week 48 after Holm adjustment. Comparisons involving the SM-only group were exploratory. Conclusions Over 48 weeks, PBM + SM and OS + SM produced comparable improvements in pain and maximum painless mouth opening, with no significant between-group difference in masticatory muscle tender points at week 48. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06419738
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLoS ONE, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Complementary and Manual Therapy
Complementary and Manual TherapyHealth Professions