Philosophical Studies· 2026Q1
On latitude in attitude. Multidimensionalism and the right kind of reasons for belief
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
This paper argues against extending multidimensionalism about normative support from practical norms (actions) to epistemic norms (beliefs), finding that the 'right kind of reasons' for beliefs do not translate well to multiple dimensions of normative strength.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Multidimensionalism about normative support is a theory applied to practical norms governing actions.
- The paper questions whether this theory adequately explains latitude in doxastic attitudes (beliefs).
- A general theory is presented for applying multidimensionalism to 'right kind of reasons' for attitudes.
- Reasons for intentions can exhibit different dimensions of strength related to attitude fittingness.
- This multidimensional strength does not translate well to the case of doxastic attitudes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract It has been argued that multidimensionalism about normative support is a promising theory of the latitude exemplified by practical norms governing actions. One might, thus, suspect that a similar form of multidimensionalism might be an adequate explanation of the kind of latitude exemplified in one’s doxastic attitudes and provide further resources to epistemic permissivists regarding epistemic norms governing beliefs. In this paper, I raise some concerns regarding this contention. First, I provide a general theory of how multidimensionalism about normative support can be applied to the so-called right kind of reasons for attitudes, given that the former is commonly coated in contrastivist terms. Second, I offer a theory of how right kind of reasons for intentions could have different dimensions of strength, depending on how they relate to the fittingness and unfittingness of the attitudes in question. Finally, I show that this straightforward way to allow for multiple dimensions of normative strength of right kind of reasons does not translate well to the case of doxastic attitudes.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Philosophical Studies, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Philosophy
PhilosophyArts and Humanities