PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Sophia· 2026Q1

Paradoxical Grounding Panentheism: Acintya Bhedābheda as a Paradigmatic Instance of Panentheism

Ricardo Sousa Silvestre

Short summary

This paper argues that 16th-century Caitanya Bhedābheda theology, particularly Jīva Gosvāmī's metaphysics, exemplifies 'grounding panentheism,' a model where the world is 'in' God by being grounded in God, and represents a paradigmatic instance of panentheism.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Bhedābheda traditions, particularly Jīva Gosvāmī's Caitanya theology, are argued to be paradigmatic instances of panentheism.
  • The paper introduces 'grounding panentheism,' where the world is 'in' God by being grounded in God.
  • Jīva Gosvāmī's model accepts the panentheistic paradox as a metaphysical feature, serving as an ideal exemplar.
  • This reconstruction compels a reconsideration of the concept of panentheism and grounding.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Although a number of influential Indian traditions have been understood as panentheistic by contemporary scholars, the Bhedābheda schools have remained largely absent from these discussions. This paper argues that Bhedābheda traditions can be characterized as panentheistic and, more strongly, that they constitute paradigmatic instances of panentheism. It develops this claim through a philosophical reconstruction of the metaphysics of Jīva Gosvāmī (16th century), the principal theologian of the Caitanya Bhedābheda tradition. This tradition is especially significant for three reasons. First, it exemplifies an underexplored variety of panentheism—grounding panentheism—in which the world is ‘in’ God by being grounded in God. Second, by accepting the so-called panentheistic paradox as a metaphysical feature of reality, Jīva’s model of God represents a limiting case of the paradigmatic form of panentheism exemplified by the Bhedābheda traditions, thereby serving as a paradigmatic and ideal exemplar of panentheism itself. Third, as a consequence, it compels us to reconsider the concept of panentheism itself, with important implications for both the demarcation problem and the particular notion of grounding employed in this reconstruction. More broadly, the paper illustrates a model of cross-cultural philosophy of religion in which conceptual categories are not merely applied to a tradition but are themselves refined and transformed through engagement with it.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Sophia, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Philosophy

PhilosophyArts and Humanities