Geology Ecology and Landscapes· 2026Q1· Review
Ritual waste as a misclassified urban waste stream: a critical scoping review of governance gaps and environmental management implications
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Ritual waste is often misclassified as generic municipal waste, leading to ineffective environmental management due to its unique material, cultural, and governance characteristics.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Ritual waste is frequently misclassified within generic municipal waste categories.
- Its management is influenced by material composition, social meaning, behavioral practices, and institutional arrangements.
- Reported disposal pathways vary widely, from open dumping to specialized processing like composting and black soldier fly systems.
- Governance gaps arise because conventional waste systems do not accommodate ritual timing, material diversity, or culturally specific handling.
- Effective management requires culturally legitimate, institutionally adaptive, and coordinated approaches.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Ritual waste is often subsumed within generic municipal waste categories despite distinctive material, cultural, and governance characteristics. This critical scoping review examines ritual waste as a potentially misclassified urban waste stream and how its management is shaped by material composition, social meaning, behavioural practices, and institutional arrangements. Following PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidance, searches in Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar/Publish or Perish, supplemented by citation chasing, identified 23 eligible studies. Ritual waste comprised heterogeneous biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials, while handling was influenced by sacredness, social norms, authority, convenience, facility access, and legitimacy. Reported pathways ranged from open dumping, burning, and disposal into water bodiesto segregation, composting, refuse-derived fuel , briquetting, incense production, black soldier fly processing, and bioporesystems. Governance gaps emerged where conventional waste systems failed to accommodate ritual timing, material diversity, and culturally specific handling requirements. Evidence remained geographically concentrated and methodologically heterogeneous. Ritual waste therefore becomes an environmental management challenge through misclassification, as socially significant materials are managed as ordinary waste within systems that insufficiently address symbolic and operational dimensions. Effective management requires culturally legitimate, institutionally adaptive, and coordinated approaches integrating community authority, service design, treatment options, and urban environmental policy.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Geology Ecology and Landscapes, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Waste Management and DisposalEnvironmental Science