PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Social Science Information· 2026Q2

How social science matters to the nation-state: A sociohistorical analysis of presidential addresses in Chile, 1900–2021

Tomás Koch, Carlos Montecinos, Raf Vanderstraeten

Short summary

Chilean presidential addresses reveal a shift in state demands on social sciences: from 'state-istics' for population mastery (early 20th C) to economic framing (mid-20th C), and finally to an ambivalent reliance on applied social sciences and boundary institutions (recent decades).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Chilean presidential addresses from 1900-2021 show three distinct periods in state demands on social sciences.
  • Early 20th century: 'state-istics' (rational analysis of the state) were used for population mastery.
  • Mid-20th century: Political legitimacy became increasingly framed in economic terms.
  • Recent decades: An ambivalent stance towards social sciences, with growing reliance on think tanks and policy centers.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Although entanglements between the nation-state and the social sciences are often emphasized, little is hitherto known about how the state’s demands on the social sciences have evolved over time. Through a detailed analysis of Chilean presidential addresses from 1900 to 2021, this study examines the types of scientific knowledge that mattered to the nation-state and explores how and why this knowledge made a difference for leading representatives of the Chilean state. We identify three periods. In roughly the first half of the 20th century, the rational and scientific analysis of the state ( state-istics ) was privileged as a means to master the population and its needs. In the second half of the century, the legitimacy of political decisions became increasingly framed in economic terms. In recent decades, a symbiotic relationship between the “applied” social sciences and the goals of the nation-state persists, but recent presidential addresses reveal a more ambivalent stance toward the social sciences and a growing reliance on the input of boundary institutions, such as think tanks and policy-oriented research centers. Although this study focuses on the Chilean case, it also considers the influence of global contexts in shaping this nation-building project. In this sense, the analysis situates the evolving relationship between the social sciences and the state of the “Chilean experiment” within a broader global framework, offering insights that may contribute to understanding similar dynamics in other parts of the world.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Social Science Information, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: General Social Sciences

General Social SciencesSocial Sciences