PofoliaShared via Pofolia

European Journal of Public Health· 2019Q1· Review

The impact of social prescribing services on service users: a systematic review of the evidence

Julia Vera Pescheny, Gurch Randhawa, Yannis Pappas

Short summary

A systematic review of 16 studies found mixed evidence on the effectiveness of social prescribing services in the UK's NHS, with some users reporting improvements in wellbeing and social contacts, while others did not.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Social prescribing links primary care patients with non-medical community support.
  • A review of 16 studies showed inconsistent improvements in user wellbeing and social contacts.
  • Some studies reported positive effects on health-related behaviors and self-concept.
  • The methodological quality of included studies varied significantly.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social prescribing initiatives are widely implemented in the UK National Health Service to integrate health and social care. Social prescribing is a service in primary care that links patients with non-medical needs to sources of support provided by the community and voluntary sector to help improve their health and wellbeing. Such programmes usually include navigators, who work with referred patients and issue onward referrals to sources of non-medical support. This systematic review aimed to assess the evidence of service user outcomes of social prescribing programmes based on primary care and involving navigators. METHODS: We searched 11 databases, the grey literature, and the reference lists of relevant studies to identify the available evidence on the impact of social prescribing on service users. Searches were limited to literature written in English. No date restrictions were applied, and searches were conducted to June 2018. Findings were synthesized narratively, employing thematic analysis. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool Version 2011 was used to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. RESULTS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The evidence base is mixed, some studies found improvements in health and wellbeing, health-related behaviours, self-concepts, feelings, social contacts and day-to-day functioning post-social prescribing, whereas others have not. The review also shows that the evaluation methodologies utilized were variable in quality. CONCLUSION: In order to assess the success of social prescribing services, more high quality and comparable evaluations need to be conducted in the future.International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews number: CRD42017079664.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. European Journal of Public Health, 2019 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Conservation

ConservationArts and Humanities