· 2018· Book chapter
Philosophy of social science
- 552citations
- 2018year
Short summary
The 'human uncertainty principle' combines reflexivity and fallibility to provide objective reasons for believing social science theories are biased or incomplete.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Introduces the 'human uncertainty principle' as a combination of reflexivity and fallibility.
- Argues this principle provides objective reasons to doubt social science theories.
- Asserts social science theories are likely biased, incomplete, or both.
- Positions the principle as a more specific and stringent concept than Cartesian skepticism.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Earlier, I referred to the combination of reflexivity and fallibility as the human uncertainty principle. That makes it a broader concept than reflexivity. The human uncertainty principle is much more specific and stringent than the subjective skepticism that pervades Cartesian philosophy. It gives us objective reasons to believe that the theories held by the participants, as distinct from statements of specific facts, are liable to be biased, incomplete, or both.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: History and Philosophy of Science
History and Philosophy of ScienceArts and Humanities