· 2017· Review
Causality and Modern Science
- 495citations
- 2017year
Short summary
Mario Bunge's book, now in its fourth edition, offers a non-technical exploration of the ontological problem of causality and its role in modern science, defining terms, examining critiques, and explaining causal determinism.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The book defines causality, examines its formulations, and analyzes critiques from empiricist and romantic perspectives.
- It details the assertions of causal determinism and its function in scientific laws, explanation, and prediction.
- The work is written in a non-technical style, making it accessible to both laymen and specialists.
- The demand for a fourth edition highlights the continued importance and popularity of causality as a subject of philosophical inquiry.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The causal problem has become topical once again. While we are no longer causalists or believers in the universal truth of the causal principle we continue to think of causes and effects, as well as of causal and noncausal relations among them. Instead of becoming indeterminists we have enlarged determinism to include noncausal categories. And we are still in the process of characterizing our basic concepts and principles concerning causes and effects with the help of exact tools. This is because we want to explain, not just describe, the ways of things. The causal principle is not the only means of understanding the world but it is one of them.The demand for a fourth edition of this distinguished book on the subject of causality is clear evidence that this principle continues to be an important and popular area of philosophic enquiry. Non-technical and clearly written, this book focuses on the ontological problem of causality, with specific emphasis on the place of the causal principle in modern science. Mario Bunge first defines the terminology employed and describes various formulations of the causal principle. He then examines the two primary critiques of causality, the empiricist and the romantic, as a prelude to the detailed explanation of the actual assertions of causal determinism.Bunge analyzes the function of the causal principle in science, touching on such subjects as scientific law, scientific explanation, and scientific prediction. In so doing, he offers an education to layman and specialist alike on the history of a concept and its opponents. Professor William A. Wallace, author of Causality and Scientific Explanation said of an earlier edition of this work: "I regard it as a truly seminal work in this field."
The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2017 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: History and Philosophy of Science
History and Philosophy of ScienceArts and Humanities