PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Algorithms· 2026Q2

Interpretable Heart Disease Prediction: Optimizing Machine Learning Models via Metaheuristic Ivy Algorithm

Yang Jiang, Zihao Zuo, Rui Liang, Jiabin Xu et al.

Short summary

The Ivy Algorithm (IVYA) optimized machine learning models for heart disease prediction, with IVYA-LightGBM achieving 0.945 AUC and 0.907 accuracy, outperforming other optimizers and standard models on two datasets.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The Ivy Algorithm (IVYA) was used to optimize hyperparameters for ID3, SVM, RF, XGBoost, and LightGBM models for heart disease prediction.
  • IVYA-LightGBM achieved the highest performance with mean AUC of 0.945, accuracy of 0.907, precision of 0.931, recall of 0.864, and F1-score of 0.893.
  • IVYA showed statistically significant improvements in AUC for most model-dataset comparisons.
  • IVYA outperformed five other metaheuristic algorithms in AUC, Recall, F1-score, and runtime.
  • SHAP analysis was used to improve the interpretability of the prediction models.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases remain a major global health burden, making the development of accurate and interpretable prediction models important for clinical decision support. In this study, the metaheuristic Ivy Algorithm was employed to perform two-stage hyperparameter optimization for five machine learning classifiers, namely ID3, SVM, RF, XGBoost, and LightGBM. The proposed framework was evaluated on the publicly available Cleveland and Statlog heart disease datasets using outer stratified 10-fold cross-validation. The results showed that IVYA-based optimization improved the predictive performance of all five classifiers to varying degrees. Among them, IVYA-LightGBM achieved the best overall performance, with mean AUC, Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-score values of 0.945, 0.907, 0.931, 0.864, and 0.893, respectively. Paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests based on the fold-wise results indicated that the improvements in AUC were statistically significant in most model–dataset comparisons. In addition, under consistent experimental settings, IVYA was compared with five widely used metaheuristic optimization algorithms and achieved the highest AUC, Recall, and F1-score, while requiring the shortest average runtime. To enhance model interpretability, SHAP analysis was further incorporated to quantify the contributions of different clinical features to the model predictions and improve the transparency of the prediction process. Overall, IVYA-LightGBM achieved a favorable balance among predictive performance, computational efficiency, and interpretability. Nevertheless, further validation on larger and more diverse clinical datasets is required before practical clinical application.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Algorithms, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Health Information Management

Health Information ManagementHealth Professions