Qualitative Inquiry· 2025Q1
We Reject the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Reflexive Qualitative Research
- 88citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2025year
Short summary
419 experienced qualitative researchers from 32 countries argue against using generative AI (GenAI) in reflexive qualitative research, deeming it methodologically incongruent and raising social/environmental justice concerns.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 419 qualitative researchers from 32 countries advocate against GenAI in reflexive qualitative research.
- GenAI is deemed methodologically incongruent with human-centered, subjective, and reflexive research practices.
- The authors also reject GenAI for qualitative research due to social and environmental justice concerns.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Four hundred and nineteen experienced qualitative researchers from 32 countries invite readers of Qualitative Inquiry to consider their position on use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for qualitative research. We hold the position that analytic approaches such as reflexive thematic analysis are human research practices requiring a subjective, positioned, and reflexive researcher and therefore the use of GenAI in such approaches is not methodologically congruent. We additionally reject GenAI for reflexive qualitative approaches on the grounds of social and environmental justice.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Qualitative Inquiry, 2025 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Education
EducationSocial Sciences