PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Energy & Fuels· 2026Q1

Strength, Stiffness, and Poisson’s Ratio Measurements for Cements Used in the Well Completions for the Extended-Duration Gas Production Test on the Alaskan North Slope

Adrian V. Garcia, William F. Waite, Jun Yoneda, Jim Kirksey et al.

Short summary

Cements used in Alaskan North Slope gas hydrate well completions reached nominal strength plateau by 120 days, with higher-density "tail" cement used in the main hole, and generally good formation/sensor bond quality indicated despite sensor interference with evaluation logs.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Cement strengths (compressive, tensile) stabilized around 120 days, reaching nominal plateau before the production test.
  • Higher-density "tail" cement was used to encase the subpermafrost, main hole portion of each well.
  • Downhole cement evaluation logs showed interference from sensors but indicated generally good formation and sensor bond quality over reservoir intervals.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract As part of an extended-duration production test from a natural gas hydrate reservoir on the Alaska North Slope, a suite of optical-fiber sensors was encased in the completion cement to provide stable downhole monitoring around each of the four project wells. How the sensors respond to changes in the reservoir over time depends in part on properties of the LiteCRETE, ArcticCem, or Tuned Light cement in which each sensor is encased, and on how well the cement bonded to the well casing, sensors, and sediment formation. Here, we report on physical properties of the cements (compressive and tensile strength, stiffness, and Poisson’s ratio), on the downhole distribution of the cements used in each well, and on the cement bond quality. Physical property measurements are presented for cements sampled during the completion activities for the three wells completed in 2022–2023. Samples were cured while being submerged in water at 2–4 °C, then tested at intervals from ∼30 days to more than one year. After an initial period of rapid increase, cement strengths largely stabilized around 120 days in all cases, meaning that cements in all wells reached their nominal strength plateau four months or more before the production test began. Calculations based on recorded volumes of pumped cement show the subpermafrost, main hole portion of each well is encased only in the higher-density “tail” cement used in that well. Downhole cement evaluation logs from two wells demonstrate how the presence of sensors and other hardware outside the casing interferes with the cement evaluation assessment. Nonetheless, the cement evaluations indicate a generally good bond with the formation and sensors over the gas hydrate reservoir intervals.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Energy & Fuels, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Ocean Engineering

Ocean EngineeringEngineering