Circular Economy and Sustainability· 2026Q1
Who Benefits from the Circular Economy? A Systematic Scoping Review of Social Economy Actors, Livelihoods, and Policy in the Global South
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A systematic review of 1,056 articles reveals a significant disconnect between circular economy (CE) policy and the livelihoods of social economy actors in the Global South, with waste-pickers being the most documented but women and youth remaining largely invisible.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 1,056 articles were included in a systematic scoping review on circular economy (CE) social dimensions in the Global South.
- Waste-pickers are the most documented social economy actor (22.4%), while women's groups (0.3%) and youth (0.9%) are largely invisible in the literature.
- A significant policy-livelihood disconnect exists: 63.4% of studies focus on governance, but only 21.9% simultaneously examine livelihood outcomes.
- Macro-level CE performance metrics are rarely connected to the social economy actors who generate them.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract The circular economy (CE) has gained substantial policy traction, yet its social dimensions — particularly the roles, contributions, and vulnerabilities of social economy actors in the Global South—remain insufficiently mapped. This systematic scoping review examines how waste-pickers, cooperatives, social enterprises, and informal sector workers are positioned within CE transitions, adopting a multi-level analytical framework spanning micro-level livelihood outcomes, meso-level institutional and governance mechanisms, and macro-level CE system performance. Searches across OpenAlex and Crossref yielded 39,978 records; after deduplication (28,432 unique records), followed by automated pre-screening and dual-author manual title-and-abstract screening of all retained records against the eligibility criteria, 1,056 English-language articles, reviews, and book chapters were included for computational thematic analysis, with coding reliability assessed against independent manual coding of a random validation sample. The literature has grown exponentially since 2020, with inclusion and justice themes increasing by over 1,500%. Waste-pickers are the most documented actor (237 records, 22.4%), while women’s groups (0.3%) and youth (0.9%) remain almost invisible. A pronounced policy–livelihood disconnect emerges: 63.4% of studies address governance, but only 21.9% simultaneously examine livelihood outcomes. Macro-level CE performance metrics — resource efficiency, cleaner production, and material recovery rates — are rarely connected to the social economy actors who generate them. The review identifies five critical gaps and proposes a multi-level research agenda integrating social justice, institutional analysis, and system-level sustainability to guide an inclusive, socially restorative circular economy.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Strategy and Management
Strategy and ManagementBusiness, Management and Accounting