PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Health Services Research· 2026Q1

Implementation challenges and unintended financial consequences of e-prescribing in an integrated payer–provider health system: a qualitative study from Tehran, Iran

nafiseh salehnia, sajedeh salehnia

Short summary

E-prescribing implementation in Iran's integrated payer-provider system led to workflow friction, fragmented care, and unexpected out-of-pocket costs for patients due to unreliable digital infrastructure and limited interoperability.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • E-prescribing implementation faced issues with unreliable digital infrastructure and system performance.
  • Workflow friction and increased time burden were reported by healthcare providers and patients.
  • Patients experienced disrupted insurance-linked access and incurred unintended out-of-pocket payments.
  • Care pathways became fragmented due to limited interoperability.
  • Older patients and those with limited digital skills struggled more with digital processes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) is increasingly used to improve the efficiency, safety, and continuity of healthcare. However, implementation challenges may produce unintended consequences, particularly in health systems where a single organisation combines payer and provider functions. This study explored patients’ and healthcare providers’ experiences of e-prescribing implementation in Social Security Organization (SSO)-owned healthcare facilities in Tehran, Iran, focusing on workflow disruption, care-pathway fragmentation, access to insured services, and financial consequences. Methods A qualitative study using conventional qualitative content analysis was conducted from April to June 2024 in SSO-owned hospitals and outpatient healthcare facilities in Tehran. Purposive sampling recruited 28 participants with direct experience of e-prescribing, including 15 patients and 13 healthcare providers. The two groups were selected to capture complementary perspectives on implementation at the points of care and service delivery. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Persian and analysed iteratively. Patient and healthcare-provider interviews were analysed separately, with data collection continuing until saturation was reached within each group. The study was reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). Results Six interrelated themes were identified: (1) unreliable digital infrastructure and system performance, (2) workflow friction and increased time burden, (3) disrupted insurance-linked access and financial burden, (4) fragmented care pathways and limited interoperability, (5) unequal capacity to navigate digital care, and (6) conditional acceptance and unrealised benefits. Participants described how system instability, infrastructure limitations, and limited interoperability contributed to workflow disruption, delays, repeated interactions, and fragmented care. Patients also reported difficulties accessing services through insurance-linked pathways and, in some cases, unintended out-of-pocket payments despite insurance coverage. Older patients and individuals with limited digital skills experienced greater difficulties navigating digital processes. Conclusions In this integrated payer–provider context, e-prescribing implementation challenges extended beyond technical performance to affect care pathways, equity, and financial burden. Reliable infrastructure, effective interoperability, user-centred implementation, and safeguards to maintain access to insured services during system disruptions are essential for equitable and effective digital healthcare delivery.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Health Services Research, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Health Information Management

Health Information ManagementHealth Professions