Gothic.net· 2017
Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: <i>ICD-11, DSM-5</i> , and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)
- 688citations
- 2017year
Short summary
The ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnostic systems, designed for clinical use and public health, contrast with the NIMH's RDoC framework, which integrates neuroscience research to understand mental disorders.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- ICD-11 and DSM-5 are clinical/public health classification systems, while RDoC integrates neuroscience research for deeper understanding.
- Four key challenges in mental disorder classification are etiology, category vs. dimension, thresholds, and comorbidity.
- The three systems diverge in their approaches to these challenges based on their differing purposes and target audiences.
- Despite differences, all three systems aim to reduce the burden of mental disorder.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The diagnosis of mental disorder initially appears relatively straightforward: Patients present with symptoms or visible signs of illness; health professionals make diagnoses based primarily on these symptoms and signs; and they prescribe medication, psychotherapy, or both, accordingly. However, despite a dramatic expansion of knowledge about mental disorders during the past half century, understanding of their components and processes remains rudimentary. We provide histories and descriptions of three systems with different purposes relevant to understanding and classifying mental disorder. Two major diagnostic manuals-the International Classification of Diseases and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-provide classification systems relevant to public health, clinical diagnosis, service provision, and specific research applications, the former internationally and the latter primarily for the United States. In contrast, the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria provides a framework that emphasizes integration of basic behavioral and neuroscience research to deepen the understanding of mental disorder. We identify four key issues that present challenges to understanding and classifying mental disorder: etiology, including the multiple causality of mental disorder; whether the relevant phenomena are discrete categories or dimensions; thresholds, which set the boundaries between disorder and nondisorder; and comorbidity, the fact that individuals with mental illness often meet diagnostic requirements for multiple conditions. We discuss how the three systems' approaches to these key issues correspond or diverge as a result of their different histories, purposes, and constituencies. Although the systems have varying degrees of overlap and distinguishing features, they share the goal of reducing the burden of suffering due to mental disorder.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Gothic.net, 2017 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Philosophy
PhilosophyArts and Humanities