PofoliaShared via Pofolia

European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling· 2021Q3

Anti-Oedipus; Capitalism and schizophrenia

Daniel Rubinstein

Short summary

This essay argues that Deleuze and Guattari's 'Anti-Oedipus' is a seminal work, reframing desire beyond Marx and Freud and positing the psyche as a political, not just psychological, construct.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 'Anti-Oedipus' is presented as a highly important philosophical and psychoanalytic work.
  • The essay examines the concept of desire in relation to Marx and Freud.
  • Schizoanalysis is proposed as an alternative to Freudian psychoanalysis.
  • The psyche is reconceptualized as a political entity rather than solely psychological.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This essay outlines the philosophical and the psychoanalytic work that makes Anti-Oedipus by Deleuze and Guattari one of the most important books works of the last 50 years. The main issues are the notion of desire in Marx and Freud, schizoanalysis as an alternative to Freudian psychoanalysis, and the psyche's emergence as a political, rather than psychological concept.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 2021 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Philosophy

PhilosophyArts and Humanities