Religions· 2026Q1
The Digital Kōan: Artificial Intelligence, Non-Self, and Contemplative Practice
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
This article introduces the 'digital kōan,' an AI-mediated prompt designed to foster self-inquiry by revealing the constructed nature of identity, rather than offering spiritual knowledge.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Introduces the 'digital kōan' concept: AI prompts for self-inquiry, not spiritual wisdom.
- AI dialogue can reveal the constructed nature of identity and selfhood.
- Phenomenological examples show AI evoking dissonance, projection, and awareness similar to traditional kōans.
- AI lacks consciousness/spiritual authority; its value is in reflecting user assumptions and self-construction.
- Addresses ethical concerns like anthropomorphism and spiritual outsourcing, proposing mindful engagement principles.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This article introduces the concept of the digital kōan, an AI-mediated contemplative prompt that functions as a catalyst for self-inquiry rather than a source of spiritual knowledge. Drawing on Buddhist psychology, cognitive science, and contemplative phenomenology, it examines how dialogue with conversational artificial intelligence can reveal the constructed nature of identity and illuminate the processes through which meaning, selfhood, and relational presence emerge. Through a comparison of traditional Zen kōan practice and AI-generated dialogue, the article explores both the possibilities and limitations of digitally mediated contemplative inquiry. Phenomenological case examples involving kōan-based interactions with Microsoft Copilot illustrate how AI dialogue may evoke cognitive dissonance, anthropomorphic projection, and reflexive awareness in ways that resemble aspects of traditional kōan engagement. The analysis emphasizes that current conversational AI provides no established evidence of consciousness or spiritual realization and should not be treated as possessing spiritual authority. Its significance lies not in wisdom or sentience but in its capacity to occasion reflection on users’ assumptions, desires, narratives, and patterns of self-construction. The article further examines ethical concerns associated with contemplative AI, including anthropomorphism, emotional dependency, spiritual outsourcing, and the commodification of digital spirituality. It proposes practical principles for mindful engagement and contemplative technology design, including transparency, reflective prompting, embodied practices, and adaptive safeguarding mechanisms. By reframing human–AI interaction as a form of contemplative inquiry, the concept of the digital kōan contributes to emerging scholarship on AI and religion, digital spirituality, and Buddhist approaches to selfhood. It argues that AI can function as a mirror for examining the illusion of self while highlighting the importance of maintaining ethical and philosophical clarity regarding the limits of machine participation in contemplative life. The digital kōan is proposed not as a substitute for traditional contemplative practice but as a contemporary site in which questions of selfhood, projection, and spiritual meaning can be explored in technologically mediated environments.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Religions, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Philosophy
PhilosophyArts and Humanities