Agriculture and Human Values· 2026Q1
Forging agrarian trajectories through assets, strategies, and values: structural hybridization between agro-extractivism and the socio-biodiversity economy in the Brazilian Amazon
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Brazilian Amazon cocoa farmers' livelihoods reveal 'structural hybridization,' where agro-extractivist and socio-biodiversity economic dynamics are intertwined within the same households, driven by asset endowments and guiding values.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Farming households in the Brazilian Amazon exhibit 'structural hybridization,' integrating both agro-extractivist and socio-biodiversity economic dynamics.
- Agrarian trajectories are shaped by a combination of historically produced asset asymmetries and the values guiding farmers' resource mobilization.
- Conventional farmers pursue diversification and market upgrading, while organic farmers face challenges in translating agroecological values into economic practice due to weaker cooperative positions.
- The study integrates values into the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach to analyze household livelihood configurations and agrarian trajectories.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract The socio-biodiversity economy is widely regarded as an alternative agrarian pathway to agro-extractivism in the Brazilian Amazon, capable of reconciling conservation, social inclusion, and income generation. Recent research challenges this promise. Agro-extractivist dynamics have been documented in socio-biodiversity markets, while the farming households that sustain this economy remain largely overlooked, and often idealized. This study examines the livelihood configurations and agrarian trajectories of two groups of cocoa farmers in the Transamazon region—one organic, one conventional—affiliated with two regional cooperatives. It adopts a mixed-method design that extends the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach beyond its traditional focus on material assets by integrating values as a key dimension of livelihood strategies. Data were gathered between March and September 2024 through structured questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and ethnographic observations. Findings show historically produced asset asymmetries between the two groups, alongside a shared condition as petty commodity producers. Divergent agrarian trajectories emerge not only from material conditions but also from the interplay between assets and the values that guide how farmers mobilize their resources. Conventional farmers pursue emancipation from commodity dependence through economic diversification and market upgrading, while their cooperative channels individual pragmatism toward place-based value aggregation. Organic farmers secure their livelihoods through agroecological farming, but their cooperative operates from a weaker position that hinders the translation of these values into economic practice. Both these trajectories reveal the entanglement of agro-extractivist and socio-biodiversity dynamics within the same households, a condition this study terms structural hybridization. More broadly, the study calls for greater analytical attention to the agrarian dynamics unfolding among the smallholders who sustain the socio-biodiversity economy.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Agriculture and Human Values, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
HorticultureAgricultural and Biological Sciences