Family Court Review· 2026Q2
Learning from down under: A call to create Australian style family relationship centers for separating families in the United States
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Australia's 65 Family Relationship Centres (FRCs), established since 2006, offer free/low-cost mediation, triage, information, counseling, and education to reduce conflict for separating families, shifting focus from legal to relationship issues.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Australia established 65 Family Relationship Centres (FRCs) starting in 2006.
- FRCs offer free/low-cost mediation, triage, information, counseling, and education.
- FRCs are community-based and separate from courthouses.
- FRCs and a mandatory mediation policy shifted focus from legal to relationship issues for separating families.
- Empirical evaluations show FRCs are achieving their goals of reducing conflict and stabilizing relationships.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Australia's Family Relationship Centres (FRCs) are a bold innovation in dispute resolution for separating families. Beginning in 2006, the Australian Government created 65 FRCs which provide free or low‐cost mediation, triage, information, counseling and education designed to reduce conflict and stabilize relationships between separating parents and between separating parents and children. FRCs are based in the communities they serve in a location separate from the courthouse. Australia created the FRCs at approximately the same time it enacted a presumptive mandate that separating parents attempt mediation before filing an application to the court concerning their children. Empirical evaluations of FRCs establish they are achieving their goals. FRCs and the mediation mandate have changed the culture in Australia surrounding dispute resolution for separating families from thinking of their disputes as a legal problem to thinking of them as the product of relationship issues. This article argues that creation of FRCs in the United States combined with a mediation mandate would have a similar positive impact on separating parents, children, courts and communities here and makes suggestions for how such a project could be organized and funded.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Family Court Review, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Demography
DemographySocial Sciences