PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society· 2026Q2

Gandhi’s Buddhism: assimilation, theologisation, and politicisation by a ‘modern Buddha’

Bhadrajee Hewage

Short summary

Mahatma Gandhi reinterpreted Buddhism, recasting the Buddha as a moral archetype within a Hindu framework to serve his ethical and political goals.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Gandhi assimilated Buddhist concepts, reinterpreting them within a theistic Hindu moral framework.
  • The Buddha was recast as an 'exemplarist' model of moral conduct, not a doctrinal figure.
  • Buddhist ideas were translated into Hindu idioms like 'Truth' and 'moral government'.
  • This translation made Buddhism accessible to devotional Hindu audiences but muted its radicalism.
  • Critics like Ambedkar and Dharmapala viewed Gandhi's approach as a distortion of Buddhism's emancipatory potential.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract This article examines Mahatma Gandhi’s lifelong engagement with Buddhism as a process of assimilation, theologisation, and politicisation that recast the Buddha from a historical teacher of renunciation into a modern moral archetype. Drawing on Gandhi’s extensive corpus of writings and speeches, it shows how Buddhist concepts were reinterpreted within a theistic, sanātana Hindu moral framework to serve his ethical and political aims. Gandhi’s Buddhism appears as ‘exemplarist’ rather than doctrinal: the Buddha functioned primarily as a model of moral conduct and civil self-discipline, while Buddhist ideas were translated into theistic idioms of ‘Truth’ and ‘moral government’. This translation rendered Buddhism intelligible to devotional Hindu audiences but muted its anti-theistic and anti-caste radicalism. Situating this hermeneutic within colonial modernity, the article traces Gandhi’s encounter with Buddhism from Edwin Arnold’s The Light of Asia in Victorian London to its deployment in nationalist politics and pan-Asian diplomacy. It also examines critiques by figures such as Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar and Anagarika Dharmapala, who viewed Gandhi’s approach as a distortion that contained Buddhism’s emancipatory potential. Reassessing Gandhi’s ethical borrowings, doctrinal translations, and political uses of Buddhism, the article re-evaluates his image as a ‘modern Buddha’ who simultaneously moralised politics and spiritualised reform.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Philosophy

PhilosophyArts and Humanities