· 2018
LeGO-LOAM: Lightweight and Ground-Optimized Lidar Odometry and Mapping on Variable Terrain
- 2,126citations
- 2018year
Short summary
LeGO-LOAM achieves real-time lidar odometry and mapping on low-power embedded systems, outperforming state-of-the-art methods in accuracy and computational efficiency on variable terrain.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- LeGO-LOAM enables real-time six degree-of-freedom pose estimation on low-power embedded systems.
- It uses ground plane optimization for feature extraction (planar and edge features) and a two-step Levenberg-Marquardt optimization.
- Performance comparisons show LeGO-LOAM achieves similar or better accuracy than LOAM with reduced computational expense on variable terrain.
- The system is integrated into a SLAM framework to eliminate pose estimation drift, validated on the KITTI dataset.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
We propose a lightweight and ground-optimized lidar odometry and mapping method, LeGO-LOAM, for realtime six degree-of-freedom pose estimation with ground vehicles. LeGO-LOAM is lightweight, as it can achieve realtime pose estimation on a low-power embedded system. LeGO-LOAM is ground-optimized, as it leverages the presence of a ground plane in its segmentation and optimization steps. We first apply point cloud segmentation to filter out noise, and feature extraction to obtain distinctive planar and edge features. A two-step Levenberg-Marquardt optimization method then uses the planar and edge features to solve different components of the six degree-of-freedom transformation across consecutive scans. We compare the performance of LeGO-LOAM with a state-of-the-art method, LOAM, using datasets gathered from variable-terrain environments with ground vehicles, and show that LeGO-LOAM achieves similar or better accuracy with reduced computational expense. We also integrate LeGO-LOAM into a SLAM framework to eliminate the pose estimation error caused by drift, which is tested using the KITTI dataset.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Aerospace Engineering
Aerospace EngineeringEngineering