Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)· 2016· Review
Past, present, and future of simultaneous localization and mapping: Toward the robust-perception age
- 3,158citations
- 2016year
Short summary
This review surveys the significant progress in Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) over 30 years, highlighting its transition from research to industry and its role in enabling large-scale real-world applications.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- SLAM technology has matured significantly over 30 years, moving from academic research to widespread industrial application.
- The review covers standard SLAM formulations, robustness, scalability, semantic mapping, and active SLAM.
- The paper critically assesses open challenges and identifies new research avenues in SLAM.
- It addresses fundamental questions about the necessity and completeness of current SLAM solutions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) consists in the concurrent construction of a model of the environment (the map), and the estimation of the state of the robot moving within it. The SLAM community has made astonishing progress over the last 30 years, enabling large-scale real-world applications and witnessing a steady transition of this technology to industry. We survey the current state of SLAM and consider future directions. We start by presenting what is now the de-facto standard formulation for SLAM. We then review related work, covering a broad set of topics including robustness and scalability in long-term mapping, metric and semantic representations for mapping, theoretical performance guarantees, active SLAM and exploration, and other new frontiers. This paper simultaneously serves as a position paper and tutorial to those who are users of SLAM. By looking at the published research with a critical eye, we delineate open challenges and new research issues, that still deserve careful scientific investigation. The paper also contains the authors' take on two questions that often animate discussions during robotics conferences: Do robots need SLAM? and Is SLAM solved?
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich), 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Aerospace Engineering
Aerospace EngineeringEngineering