PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Canadian Journal of Philosophy· 2026Q1

The Compound Relational Structure of Moral Claim-Rights

Simon May

Short summary

A new 'compound relational account' of moral claim-rights proposes that they are formed by the substantive union of two independent normative relations: direction and standing.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Moral claim-rights have three relational features: direction, standing, and status.
  • The independence thesis states that direction and standing are conceptually separate normative relations.
  • The integration thesis asserts that claim-rights are formed by the substantive union of direction and standing.
  • The status of a claim-right is determined by the nature of this union.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Moral claim-rights possess three important relational features: direction , standing , and status. I set out an analysis of the structure of moral claim-rights that accounts for these three features. The compound relational account I defend comprises two theses. The independence thesis denies any entailment between the first two features of claim-rights—direction and standing are two conceptually independent normative relations. The integration thesis asserts that moral claim-rights consist in the substantive justificatory union of these two relations. The third feature of claim-rights inheres in the nature of this union.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Philosophy

PhilosophyArts and Humanities