PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology· 2026Q1· Review

Minimalist Footwear and Knee Joint Loading During Walking in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review of Evidence for Osteoarthritis Prevention

Titus Vari, Iulia-Mihaela Vălean, T. Popa, Alexandru Roman et al.

Short summary

A systematic review found insufficient evidence to recommend minimalist footwear for preventing knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in healthy adults, citing small, overlapping sample sizes and inconsistent outcome reporting across six studies (100 unique participants).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Six publications from only four independent cohorts (100 unique participants) were included in the systematic review.
  • No significant differences were found in peak knee adduction or flexion moments between minimalist and conventional footwear.
  • Key knee loading markers like KAM impulse and patellofemoral contact force were not reported by any study.
  • Evidence certainty was rated as very low due to overlapping samples, non-comparable definitions, and absent discrete data.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Minimalist footwear has been proposed as a passive means of reducing knee loading, but its effects during walking in healthy adults, the population relevant to primary prevention of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), have not previously been synthesized. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 (PROSPERO CRD420261396693), four databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to September 2026 without date restriction. Primary outcomes were peak knee adduction moment (KAM), KAM impulse, peak knee flexion moment (KFM), and patellofemoral contact force; secondary outcomes were vertical loading rate, stride length, cadence, foot strike angle, and foot progression angle as a registered post hoc amendment. Risk of bias was assessed in duplicate with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for crossover trials; synthesis was narrative; certainty was rated with GRADE. Results: Six publications met the criteria, but they derive from only four independent cohorts and 100 unique participants: three of the six report the same cohort of 40, a shared structure disclosed in none of them. Two of the four primary outcomes were reported by a single study in one cohort of 16, which found no difference between minimalist and conventional footwear in either peak KAM or peak KFM; KAM impulse and patellofemoral contact force were not reported by any study. Vertical loading rate, spatiotemporal parameters, and foot progression angle were discordant or non-comparable between cohorts. The meta-analysis was precluded by overlapping samples, absent discrete data and non-comparable outcome definitions; certainty was very low for every outcome. Conclusions: The evidence is smaller and less independent than its publication count suggests, and no recommendation for or against minimalist footwear in KOA prevention is currently supportable. Whether these loading markers, studied mainly in relation to progression in established osteoarthritis rather than incident disease in healthy joints, are appropriate prevention targets also remains unclear.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Rheumatology

RheumatologyMedicine