International Medical Education· 2026Q2
Scientific Competence in Undergraduate Medical Education: Professional Orientations of Physiology Educators
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Physiology educators conceptualize Scientific Competence (SC) in medical students as encompassing scientific thinking, practices, and agency, with varying emphasis on autonomous knowledge generation for all versus research-track students.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Scientific Competence (SC) in medical education comprises scientific thinking, practices, and agency.
- Educators consistently value critical appraisal, methodological understanding, and evidence-informed practice for future physicians.
- There is varied emphasis on autonomous participation in knowledge generation, with debate on its inclusion for all students versus research-track specialists.
- The study used Bohnsack’s documentary method with 30 physiology educators from German medical faculties and a didactic workshop.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Introduction: Scientific Competence (SC) is a central objective in medical education, but its conceptualization remains insufficiently differentiated, particularly regarding the relationship between evidence use and participation in scientific knowledge generation. Objective: This study reconstructs how physiology educators conceptualized SC and related different forms of scientific engagement within their professional orientation frameworks. Methods: Three group discussions were conducted in 2015–2016 with physiology educators from two German medical faculties and a didactic workshop of the German Physiological Society (n = 30). Bohnsack’s documentary method was used to reconstruct shared and contrasting professional orientation frameworks. Results: SC encompassed scientific thinking, scientific practices, and scientific agency. Critical appraisal, methodological understanding, and evidence-informed medical practice were consistently constructed as relevant to future physicians. Autonomous participation in knowledge generation was also valued, but its curricular positioning varied: participants differed in whether authentic inquiry should be expected of all students or whether more sustained independent research participation should primarily be associated with research-oriented trajectories. Conclusions: This historically situated reconstruction suggests that the central curricular question is not simply whether SC should be developed, but which forms of scientific participation should be expected of all physicians and which remain more closely associated with research-oriented trajectories. The findings offer conceptual hypotheses for examining this distinction in contemporary medical education.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Medical Education, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Education
EducationSocial Sciences