PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Systematic Biology· 2013Q1

Evolutionary Covariation in Geometric Morphometric Data: Analyzing Integration, Modularity, and Allometry in a Phylogenetic Context

Christian Peter Klingenberg, Jesús Marugán‐Lobón

Short summary

Skull shape in birds shows significant phylogenetic signal and strong evolutionary integration between the face and braincase, rejecting the hypothesis of separate modules.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Phylogenetic signal is significant in bird skull shape.
  • Evolutionary allometry is evident between skull size and shape.
  • Strong evolutionary integration exists between the face and braincase.
  • The face and braincase do not appear to be separate evolutionary modules.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Quantifying integration and modularity of evolutionary changes in morphometric traits is crucial for understanding how organismal shapes evolve. For this purpose, comparative studies are necessary, which need to take into account the phylogenetic structure of interspecific data. This study applies several of the standard tools of geometric morphometrics, which mostly have been used in intraspecific studies, in the new context of analyzing integration and modularity based on comparative data. Morphometric methods such as principal component analysis, multivariate regression, partial least squares, and modularity tests can be applied to phylogenetically independent contrasts of shape data. We illustrate this approach in an analysis of cranial evolution in 160 species from all orders of birds. Mapping the shape information onto the phylogeny indicates that there is a significant phylogenetic signal in skull shape. Multivariate regression of independent contrasts of shape on independent contrasts of size reveals clear evolutionary allometry. Regardless of whether or not a correction for allometry is used, evolutionary integration between the face and braincase is strong, and tests reject the hypothesis that the face and braincase are separate evolutionary modules. These analyses can easily be applied to other taxa and can be combined with other morphometric tools to address a wide range of questions about evolutionary patterns and processes.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Systematic Biology, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Geometry and Topology

Geometry and TopologyMathematics