PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Anesthesiology· 2013Q1

Disruption of Frontal–Parietal Communication by Ketamine, Propofol, and Sevoflurane

UnCheol Lee, Seungwoo Ku, Gyu‐Jeong Noh, Seung-Hye Baek et al.

Short summary

Ketamine, propofol, and sevoflurane all significantly inhibit feedback connectivity in frontal-parietal brain networks, a disruption that correlates with loss of consciousness.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Ketamine, propofol, and sevoflurane all inhibit feedback connectivity in frontal-parietal networks.
  • Feedback connectivity was significantly inhibited after loss of consciousness during ketamine anesthesia (0.0074 ± 0.003 vs. 0.0055 ± 0.0027, P < 0.0001).
  • Feedforward connectivity in frontal-parietal networks was preserved during ketamine anesthesia.
  • EEG data from 30 surgical patients were analyzed using normalized symbolic transfer entropy.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Directional connectivity from anterior to posterior brain regions (or "feedback" connectivity) has been shown to be inhibited by propofol and sevoflurane. In this study the authors tested the hypothesis that ketamine would also inhibit cortical feedback connectivity in frontoparietal networks. METHODS: Surgical patients (n = 30) were recruited for induction of anesthesia with intravenous ketamine (2 mg/kg); electroencephalography of the frontal and parietal regions was acquired. The authors used normalized symbolic transfer entropy, a computational method based on information theory, to measure directional connectivity across frontal and parietal regions. Statistical analysis of transfer entropy measures was performed with the permutation test and the time-shift test to exclude false-positive connectivity. For comparison, the authors used normalized symbolic transfer entropy to reanalyze electroencephalographic data gathered from surgical patients receiving either propofol (n = 9) or sevoflurane (n = 9) for anesthetic induction. RESULTS: Ketamine reduced alpha power and increased gamma power, in contrast to both propofol and sevoflurane. During administration of ketamine, feedback connectivity gradually diminished and was significantly inhibited after loss of consciousness (mean ± SD of baseline and anesthesia: 0.0074 ± 0.003 and 0.0055 ± 0.0027; F(5, 179) = 7.785, P < 0.0001). By contrast, feedforward connectivity was preserved during exposure to ketamine (mean ± SD of baseline and anesthesia: 0.0041 ± 0.0015 and 0.0046 ± 0.0018; F(5, 179) = 2.07; P = 0.072). Like ketamine, propofol and sevoflurane selectively inhibited feedback connectivity after anesthetic induction. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse anesthetics disrupt frontal-parietal communication, despite molecular and neurophysiologic differences. Analysis of directional connectivity in frontal-parietal networks could provide a common metric of general anesthesia and insight into the cognitive neuroscience of anesthetic-induced unconsciousness.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Anesthesiology, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineMedicine