PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2015Q1

Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion after Cardiac Surgery

Gavin J. Murphy, Katie Pike, Chris Rogers, Sarah Wordsworth et al.

Short summary

A restrictive red-cell transfusion threshold (<7.5 g/dL hemoglobin) after cardiac surgery was not superior to a liberal threshold (<9 g/dL) in reducing serious infection or ischemic events within 3 months, and was associated with more deaths (4.2% vs. 2.6%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Restrictive transfusion threshold (<7.5 g/dL hemoglobin) did not reduce serious infection or ischemic events compared to a liberal threshold (<9 g/dL) after cardiac surgery.
  • The restrictive threshold was associated with a statistically significant increase in mortality (4.2% vs. 2.6%).
  • Transfusion rates were substantially lower in the restrictive group (53.4%) versus the liberal group (92.2%).
  • Health care costs did not differ significantly between the two transfusion strategies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether a restrictive threshold for hemoglobin level in red-cell transfusions, as compared with a liberal threshold, reduces postoperative morbidity and health care costs after cardiac surgery is uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, parallel-group trial in which patients older than 16 years of age who were undergoing nonemergency cardiac surgery were recruited from 17 centers in the United Kingdom. Patients with a postoperative hemoglobin level of less than 9 g per deciliter were randomly assigned to a restrictive transfusion threshold (hemoglobin level <7.5 g per deciliter) or a liberal transfusion threshold (hemoglobin level <9 g per deciliter). The primary outcome was a serious infection (sepsis or wound infection) or an ischemic event (permanent stroke [confirmation on brain imaging and deficit in motor, sensory, or coordination functions], myocardial infarction, infarction of the gut, or acute kidney injury) within 3 months after randomization. Health care costs, excluding the index surgery, were estimated from the day of surgery to 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 2007 patients underwent randomization; 4 participants withdrew, leaving 1000 in the restrictive-threshold group and 1003 in the liberal-threshold group. Transfusion rates after randomization were 53.4% and 92.2% in the two groups, respectively. The primary outcome occurred in 35.1% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group and 33.0% of the patients in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.34; P=0.30); there was no indication of heterogeneity according to subgroup. There were more deaths in the restrictive-threshold group than in the liberal-threshold group (4.2% vs. 2.6%; hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.67; P=0.045). Serious postoperative complications, excluding primary-outcome events, occurred in 35.7% of participants in the restrictive-threshold group and 34.2% of participants in the liberal-threshold group. Total costs did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: A restrictive transfusion threshold after cardiac surgery was not superior to a liberal threshold with respect to morbidity or health care costs. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment program; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN70923932.).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Biochemistry (Medicine)

BiochemistryMedicine