PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Cognitive Processing· 2026Q2

Do sung speech and background noise affect sentence repetition in dyslexia?

Ariadne Loutrari, Ellie Packham, Roshni Vagadia, Cunmei Jiang et al.

Short summary

Adults with dyslexia (DD) performed significantly worse than controls on sentence repetition in quiet, but not in noise, and sung speech did not improve performance.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Adults with dyslexia (n=28) had significantly poorer sentence repetition in quiet compared to controls (n=28).
  • The sentence repetition deficit in dyslexia was not observed in background noise.
  • Sung speech targets did not statistically improve sentence repetition performance in individuals with dyslexia.
  • Semantic content of sentences (story-like, news-like, anomalous) did not significantly affect sentence repetition performance.
  • Approximately 29% of the dyslexia sample met diagnostic criteria for amusia, but this comorbidity did not impact sentence repetition.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Developmental dyslexia (DD) is typically associated with slow and laborious reading, but there is also evidence pointing to speech-in-noise perception difficulties and a deficit in rapid stimulus processing. We looked at sentence repetition in 56 adult participants, half of whom had a diagnosis of DD, using a mixed design with one between-subjects variable (group) and three within-subjects variables (presentation, noise level, and semantic content). More specifically, we investigated whether sung targets could facilitate sentence repetition in DD compared to spoken ones, drawing on the idea that singing has a slower presentation rate. Further, in light of difficulties in repeating semantically meaningless targets in DD and the mixed results regarding speech-in-noise perception in this population, we examined the effects of varying semantic content (story-like, news-like, semantically anomalous) on performance, presenting targets in quiet and in noise. Results showed a significantly poorer performance in DD in quiet relative to controls but not in noise. Semantic content came out non-significant, and sung targets did not statistically affect performance. Considering a previously documented dyslexia-amusia comorbidity, we screened all participants for amusia, and—in line with previous research—we found that approximately 29% of the DD sample met the diagnostic criteria for amusia. However, amusia did not significantly affect performance. The study suggests that sentence repetition is impaired in DD and naturalistic singing does not seem to confer an advantage. As we did not isolate presentation rate as a variable, the results cannot establish that a reduced presentation rate itself has no positive effects.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Cognitive Processing, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Developmental and Educational Psychology

Developmental and Educational PsychologyPsychology