PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The Classical Quarterly· 2026Q2

THE TABLE OF EUDEMIAN ETHICS II 3 (1220B38–1221A12) IN CONTEXT

Giulio Di Basilio

Short summary

This essay argues against excising the third column of the table in Aristotle's Eudemian Ethics II 3, contending that its retention enhances understanding of Aristotle's project.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract In his new edition of the Greek text of Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics , Rowe has excised the third column of the table of EE II 3. In this essay, I argue that a careful understanding of the argumentative approach Aristotle adopts in these sections provides strong grounds for rejecting Rowe’s editorial bracketing of the third column. My argument is divided into four parts. First, I contend that in EE II 3 Aristotle intends to expound the domains of the several character virtues by articulating their underlying πάθη. Next, I show that Aristotle employs the notion of paronymy to conduct the enquiry into character virtue at the level of the abstract quality and of the concrete individual who exhibits the relevant πάθος. I then turn to considering the specific difficulties involved in making sense of two lines of the table, namely the δίκαιον and the φρόνησις trio. On the whole, I hope to show not only that the transmitted text should be retained as is, but also that understanding why this is so will enhance significantly our understanding of Aristotle’s project in these sections of the EE .

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Classical Quarterly, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysIn the app
Key pointsIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways, key points and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Sign in on the web to open

Field: Philosophy

PhilosophyArts and Humanities