PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Smart Learning Environments· 2024Q1· Review

The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review

Chunpeng Zhai, Santoso Wibowo, Lily D. Li

Short summary

Students' over-reliance on AI dialogue systems, driven by ethical concerns and a preference for quick solutions, impairs critical cognitive abilities like decision-making and analytical reasoning.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Over-reliance on AI dialogue systems impairs students' critical cognitive abilities.
  • Ethical issues in AI and the preference for quick solutions contribute to this over-reliance.
  • The review analyzed 14 articles from ProQuest, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science.
  • Cognitive functions affected include decision-making, critical thinking, and analytical reasoning.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) dialogue systems within educational and research settings highlights the importance of learning aids. Despite examination of the ethical concerns associated with these technologies, there is a noticeable gap in investigations on how these ethical issues of AI contribute to students’ over-reliance on AI dialogue systems, and how such over-reliance affects students’ cognitive abilities. Overreliance on AI occurs when users accept AI-generated recommendations without question, leading to errors in task performance in the context of decision-making. This typically arises when individuals struggle to assess the reliability of AI or how much trust to place in its suggestions. This systematic review investigates how students’ over-reliance on AI dialogue systems, particularly those embedded with generative models for academic research and learning, affects their critical cognitive capabilities including decision-making, critical thinking, and analytical reasoning. By using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, our systematic review evaluated a body of literature addressing the contributing factors and effects of such over-reliance within educational and research contexts. The comprehensive literature review spanned 14 articles retrieved from four distinguished databases: ProQuest, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. Our findings indicate that over-reliance stemming from ethical issues of AI impacts cognitive abilities, as individuals increasingly favor fast and optimal solutions over slow ones constrained by practicality. This tendency explains why users prefer efficient cognitive shortcuts, or heuristics, even amidst the ethical issues presented by AI technologies.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Smart Learning Environments, 2024 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Health Informatics

Health InformaticsMedicine