New England Journal of Medicine· 2013Q1
Cystatin C versus Creatinine in Determining Risk Based on Kidney Function
- 976citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2013year
Short summary
Measuring cystatin C alongside creatinine identifies more individuals with reduced kidney function (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m²) and improves risk prediction for death and end-stage renal disease compared to creatinine alone.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Cystatin C-based eGFR identified 13.7% of the general population with eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m², compared to 9.7% with creatinine-based eGFR.
- Reclassification of eGFR using cystatin C improved prediction of death (net reclassification improvement 0.23) and end-stage renal disease (net reclassification improvement 0.10).
- Both higher and lower eGFR reclassifications based on cystatin C were significantly associated with altered risks of death, cardiovascular death, and end-stage renal disease.
- Results were consistent across general populations and chronic kidney disease cohorts, and when using both creatinine and cystatin C.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adding the measurement of cystatin C to that of serum creatinine to determine the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improves accuracy, but the effect on detection, staging, and risk classification of chronic kidney disease across diverse populations has not been determined. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 11 general-population studies (with 90,750 participants) and 5 studies of cohorts with chronic kidney disease (2960 participants) for whom standardized measurements of serum creatinine and cystatin C were available. We compared the association of the eGFR, as calculated by the measurement of creatinine or cystatin C alone or in combination with creatinine, with the rates of death (13,202 deaths in 15 cohorts), death from cardiovascular causes (3471 in 12 cohorts), and end-stage renal disease (1654 cases in 7 cohorts) and assessed improvement in reclassification with the use of cystatin C. RESULTS: In the general-population cohorts, the prevalence of an eGFR of less than 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area was higher with the cystatin C-based eGFR than with the creatinine-based eGFR (13.7% vs. 9.7%). Across all eGFR categories, the reclassification of the eGFR to a higher value with the measurement of cystatin C, as compared with creatinine, was associated with a reduced risk of all three study outcomes, and reclassification to a lower eGFR was associated with an increased risk. The net reclassification improvement with the measurement of cystatin C, as compared with creatinine, was 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.28) for death and 0.10 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.21) for end-stage renal disease. Results were generally similar for the five cohorts with chronic kidney disease and when both creatinine and cystatin C were used to calculate the eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cystatin C alone or in combination with creatinine strengthens the association between the eGFR and the risks of death and end-stage renal disease across diverse populations. (Funded by the National Kidney Foundation and others.).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2013 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Nephrology
NephrologyMedicine