Nephron Clinical Practice· 2012
KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Kidney Injury
- 8,036citations
- 2012year
Short summary
The KDIGO guidelines provide a framework for managing acute kidney injury (AKI), categorizing recommendations by strength and quality of evidence.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Recommendations are classified as 'should' (strong) or 'may' (weak/suggested).
- Evidence quality is graded A (high) to D (very low).
- Guidelines address AKI definition, prevention, treatment, CI-AKI, and dialysis.
- A comprehensive summary is available online at www.kdigo.org.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
tion’, implying that most patients ‘should’ receive a particular action. In contrast, level 2 guidelines are essentially ‘suggestions’ and are deemed to be ‘weak’ or discretionary, recognising that management decisions may vary in different clinical contexts. Each recommendation was further graded from A to D by the quality of evidence underpinning them, with grade A referring to a high quality of evidence whilst grade D recognised a ‘very low’ evidence base. The overall strength and quality of the supporting evidence is summarised in table 1 . The guidelines focused on 4 key domains: (1) AKI definition, (2) prevention and treatment of AKI, (3) contrastinduced AKI (CI-AKI) and (4) dialysis interventions for the treatment of AKI. The full summary of clinical practice statements is available at www.kdigo.org, but a few key recommendation statements will be highlighted here.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Nephron Clinical Practice, 2012 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Nephrology
NephrologyMedicine