PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Cogent Social Sciences· 2026Q2

Who benefits from public education spending in Pakistan? Evidence from income and language benefit incidence analysis

Muhammad Adnan Yasin, Fouzia Yasmin, Muqarab Abbas, Karim Khan et al.

Short summary

Public education spending in Pakistan disproportionately benefits wealthier groups at secondary and higher education levels, and underrepresents certain linguistic communities, according to an analysis of income and language benefit incidence.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Poorer income groups receive a larger share of public education spending at the primary level.
  • Wealthier income groups become increasingly represented at secondary and higher education levels.
  • Several linguistic communities are comparatively underrepresented at higher stages of education.
  • Income-based measures alone provide an incomplete picture of public education benefit distribution.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Equity in public education spending is commonly assessed through income-based measures, potentially overlooking other dimensions along which educational participation and public benefits vary. This study extends conventional benefit incidence analysis (BIA) by examining the distribution of public education spending (PES) in Pakistan across the intersection of income and language. The analysis draws on data from the Household Integrated Economic Survey, federal and provincial Annual Budget Statements, UNESCO’s World Inequality Database on Education and the Pakistan Population Census 2017. The findings reveal differences in benefit incidence across income-language groups and educational levels. Poorer groups receive relatively larger shares of PES at the primary level, whereas better-off groups become increasingly represented among beneficiaries at secondary and higher levels. Considerable variation is also observed across linguistic groups, with several communities comparatively underrepresented at higher stages of education. These patterns show that income alone provides an incomplete account of the distribution of public educational benefits in Pakistan. As a descriptive framework, BIA identifies these distributional disparities without establishing their underlying causal mechanisms. By incorporating language alongside income, the study broadens conventional assessments of educational equity and offers a more differentiated account of who benefits from PES in multilingual societies.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Cogent Social Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Sign in on the web to open

Field: Education

EducationSocial Sciences