PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Research Policy· 2026Q1

Can artificial intelligence accelerate technological progress? Researchers' perspectives on AI in manufacturing and materials science

John P. Nelson, Olajide E. Olugbade, Philip Shapira, Justin B. Biddle

Short summary

AI/ML tools accelerate sustaining innovations in materials and manufacturing by enabling cheaper, faster design space searches, yielding cost, time, and computation savings.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • AI/ML primarily models materials and manufacturing processes, speeding up design space exploration.
  • Benefits include cost, time, and computation savings in technology development.
  • AI/ML tools are unreliable outside of areas with dense existing data.
  • Effective use requires skilled application alongside older research techniques.
  • Concerns exist that AI could hinder disruptive theoretical advancements.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) raises expectations of substantial increases in rates of technological progress, but such anticipations are often not connected to detailed ground-level studies of AI use in innovation processes. Accordingly, it remains unclear how and to what extent AI can accelerate innovation. To help to fill this gap, we explore and assess results from 32 interviews with U.S.-based academic manufacturing and materials sciences researchers experienced with AI and machine learning (ML) techniques. We found that AI was primarily used for modeling of materials and manufacturing processes, facilitating cheaper and more rapid search of design spaces for materials and manufacturing processes alike. Benefits included cost, time, and computation savings in technology development. However, AI/ML tools were unreliable outside design spaces for which dense data were already available; they required skilled and judicious application in tandem with older research techniques; and concerns were raised about the potential to detrimentally circumvent opportunities for disruptive theoretical advancement. Based on these results, we suggest there is reason for optimism about acceleration in sustaining innovations through the use of AI/ML; but that support for conventional empirical, computational, and theoretical research is required to maintain the likelihood of further disruptive advances in manufacturing and materials.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Research Policy, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Materials Chemistry

Materials ChemistryMaterials Science