PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Museum Management and Curatorship· 2026Q1

The emotional consequences of heritage crime: the theft at the University Museum of Bergen

Anna Wessman

Short summary

Museum professionals experienced lasting sadness, anger, shame, guilt, and loss following the 2017 theft at the University Museum of Bergen, extending beyond material damage.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Museum professionals experienced significant emotional distress, including sadness, anger, shame, guilt, and loss, after a major museum theft.
  • These emotions were tied to moral responsibility, disrupted professional identity, and unresolved grief.
  • Some staff faced secondary victimization from public speculation and perceived inadequate legal responses.
  • The study calls for museum professionals to be recognized as victims of heritage crime.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This article explores how museum professionals experience and remember the long-term effects of a major museum theft, using the 2017 burglary at the University Museum of Bergen as a case study. While heritage crime research has traditionally focused on objects, sites, offenders, and legal responses, the experiences of those responsible for caring for collections have received limited attention. Drawing on theoretical perspectives from victimology, emotional labour, and ethics of care, the study explores how museum professionals experienced and continue to experience the burglary nearly a decade after the event. The research combines qualitative analysis of media coverage with reflective responses and discussions involving museum staff who were directly affected by the theft. The findings demonstrate that the burglary produced lasting emotions of sadness, anger, shame, guilt, and loss, extending far beyond material damage to the collection. Staff members frequently described feelings associated with moral responsibility, disrupted professional identity, and unresolved grief, while some also experienced forms of secondary victimisation arising from public speculation and perceived inadequacies in the legal response. The article argues that museum professionals should be recognised as victims of heritage crime alongside institutions and collections. By highlighting the human dimensions of cultural loss, it calls for more victim-centred approaches within heritage crime policy, museum practice, and future research.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Museum Management and Curatorship, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Sign in on the web to open

Space and Planetary ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences