PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Molecular Biology Reports· 2026Q2· Review

Melatonin beyond chronobiology: integrating pharmacokinetics, dose-exposure forecasting, and clinical evidence

Sergio Pandolfi, Francesco Maria Paone, Marco Metalla, Charlye Ghezzi et al.

Short summary

Melatonin, beyond its known role in sleep regulation, shows potential for non-circadian therapeutic uses, but these require an exposure-based pharmacological framework due to significant pharmacokinetic variability, especially with oral administration.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Melatonin's established role as a chronobiotic is distinct from its investigational high-exposure pharmacology.
  • Oral melatonin shows significant inter-individual variability in absorption and metabolism.
  • Intravenous melatonin provides higher and more predictable systemic concentrations than oral forms.
  • Clinical evidence for non-circadian melatonin uses (e.g., analgesic, anti-inflammatory) is heterogeneous and often lacks pharmacokinetic data.
  • ODE-based modeling is used to generate hypotheses relating dose to exposure, not for treatment recommendations.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Melatonin is established as a regulator of circadian timing and sleep, while a wider range of receptor-dependent and receptor-independent biological effects has generated interest in additional therapeutic applications. This review critically examines whether those proposed effects can be interpreted within an exposure-based pharmacological framework. We integrate recent preclinical and clinical evidence with the pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous melatonin and with ordinary differential equation (ODE)-based dose-exposure forecasting. Oral melatonin is rapidly absorbed but undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism and shows substantial interindividual variability, whereas intravenous administration produces higher and more predictable systemic concentrations. These pharmacokinetic differences do not imply therapeutic superiority of the intravenous route. Rather, they highlight the need to distinguish established chronobiotic uses from investigational high-exposure pharmacology. Clinical evidence is most coherent for sleep and circadian outcomes; evidence for perioperative, analgesic, cardiovascular, renal, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, and other non-circadian applications is more heterogeneous and frequently lacks pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic measurements. The modelling presented here is therefore hypothesis-generating and is intended to relate dose to exposure, not to provide validated treatment recommendations. Future studies should prospectively link administered dose, timing, formulation, achieved concentration, target engagement, and clinically meaningful outcomes.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Molecular Biology Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Endocrine and Autonomic Systems

Endocrine and Autonomic SystemsNeuroscience