PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Clinical Oncology· 2014Q1

Phase III Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy in Patients With N2 or N3 Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Ezra E.W. Cohen, Theodore Karrison, Masha Kocherginsky, Jeffrey Mueller et al.

Short summary

Induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) did not improve overall survival (OS) compared to CRT alone in patients with N2 or N3 locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCCHN). The study found no significant differences in OS (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.41) after a minimum 30-month follow-up.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) did not improve overall survival (OS) in patients with N2 or N3 locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCCHN).
  • No statistically significant differences were observed in OS (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.41), recurrence-free survival, or distant failure-free survival.
  • Serious adverse events were more common in the IC arm (47%) compared to the CRT-alone arm (28%).
  • The study was underpowered due to not meeting its planned patient accrual target.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Induction chemotherapy (IC) before radiotherapy lowers distant failure (DF) rates in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The goal of this phase III trial was to determine whether IC before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) further improves survival compared with CRT alone in patients with N2 or N3 disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with nonmetastatic N2 or N3 SCCHN were randomly assigned to CRT alone (CRT arm; docetaxel, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea plus radiotherapy 0.15 Gy twice per day every other week) versus two 21-day cycles of IC (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5) followed by the same CRT regimen (IC + CRT arm). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included DF-free survival, failure pattern, and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: A total of 285 patients were randomly assigned. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities during IC were febrile neutropenia (11%) and mucositis (9%); during CRT (both arms combined), they were mucositis (49%), dermatitis (21%), and leukopenia (18%). Serious adverse events were more common in the IC arm (47% v 28%; P = .002). With a minimum follow-up of 30 months, there were no statistically significant differences in OS (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.41), RFS, or DF-free survival. CONCLUSION: IC did not translate into improved OS compared with CRT alone. However, the study was underpowered because it did not meet the planned accrual target, and OS was higher than predicted in both arms. IC cannot be recommended routinely in patients with N2 or N3 locally advanced SCCHN.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2014 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Otorhinolaryngology

OtorhinolaryngologyMedicine