New England Journal of Medicine· 2019Q1
Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- 945citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2019year
Short summary
Adding gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy to standard chemoradiotherapy significantly improved 3-year recurrence-free survival (85.3% vs. 76.5%) and overall survival (94.6% vs. 90.3%) in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Adding gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy improved 3-year recurrence-free survival from 76.5% to 85.3% (hazard ratio 0.51, P=0.001).
- Overall survival at 3 years increased from 90.3% to 94.6% with the addition of induction chemotherapy.
- 96.7% of patients successfully completed the three cycles of induction chemotherapy.
- The induction chemotherapy group experienced a higher rate of acute grade 3/4 adverse events (75.7% vs. 55.7%), including neutropenia and nausea.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Additional gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy has shown promising efficacy in phase 2 trials. METHODS: In a parallel-group, multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial, we compared gemcitabine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive gemcitabine (at a dose of 1 g per square meter of body-surface area on days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin (80 mg per square meter on day 1), administered every 3 weeks for three cycles, plus chemoradiotherapy (concurrent cisplatin at a dose of 100 mg per square meter every 3 weeks for three cycles plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy) or chemoradiotherapy alone. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (i.e., freedom from disease recurrence [distant metastasis or locoregional recurrence] or death from any cause) in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary end points included overall survival, treatment adherence, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 480 patients were included in the trial (242 patients in the induction chemotherapy group and 238 in the standard-therapy group). At a median follow-up of 42.7 months, the 3-year recurrence-free survival was 85.3% in the induction chemotherapy group and 76.5% in the standard-therapy group (stratified hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.77; P = 0.001). Overall survival at 3 years was 94.6% and 90.3%, respectively (stratified hazard ratio for death, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.77). A total of 96.7% of the patients completed three cycles of induction chemotherapy. The incidence of acute adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 75.7% in the induction chemotherapy group and 55.7% in the standard-therapy group, with a higher incidence of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, nausea, and vomiting in the induction chemotherapy group. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 late toxic effects was 9.2% in the induction chemotherapy group and 11.4% in the standard-therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy added to chemoradiotherapy significantly improved recurrence-free survival and overall survival, as compared with chemoradiotherapy alone, among patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. (Funded by the Innovation Team Development Plan of the Ministry of Education and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01872962.).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2019 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Otorhinolaryngology
OtorhinolaryngologyMedicine