PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Microbiology· 2026Q1

Bacteriological quality and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacterial isolates from raw milk in dairy farms in Ethiopia

Kaleab Awoke Sebsibe, Yimer Mulugeta, Shambel Araya Haile, Tesfaye Legesse Bedada et al.

Short summary

Raw milk from Ethiopian dairy farms shows unsatisfactory bacteriological quality, with E. coli at 77% of isolates and high rates of antimicrobial resistance, including 16.6% of Gram-negatives producing ESBLs and 30% of S. aureus resistant to methicillin.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Raw milk from Ethiopian dairy farms had high mean aerobic colony counts (3.2 log10 cfu/ml) and thermotolerant coliform counts (2.69 log10 cfu/ml).
  • E. coli was the predominant isolate (77%), followed by S. aureus (13.6%).
  • Gram-negative isolates showed high resistance to tetracycline (62.2%) and streptomycin (62.2%), while Staphylococcus isolates were highly resistant to oxacillin (92.6%).
  • 16.6% of Gram-negative isolates produced extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), and 30% of S. aureus isolates were methicillin-resistant.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Foodborne illness has a significant impact on public health and the economy, affecting nearly 30% of the population in developing countries annually. Infections transmitted through milk can lead to acute and severe diseases. However, there is inadequate information available regarding the bacteriological profile and antimicrobial resistance of microbial organisms present in raw milk. This study aimed to assess the bacteriological quality and antimicrobial resistance patterns of isolates from raw milk from different dairy farms in Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was conducted in which 176 raw milk samples were selected through a multistage sampling technique from August 2022-April 2023. Bacteriological tests, including aerobic colony count, total coliform count, thermotolerant coliform count, Salmonella and Shigella detection, and Staphylococcus enumeration, were performed. Further bacterial identification was carried out via a VITEK-2 compact, whereas antimicrobial susceptibility was determined via the Kirby–Bauer disc-diffusion technique. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS V.27, which employs descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical tests. The mean aerobic colony counts were found to be 3.2 log 10 cfu/ml, and the total coliform count was 2.7 log cfu/ml. The mean thermotolerant coliform count was 2.69 log 10 cfu/ml and the E. coli count was 2.9 log 10 cfu/ml. The mean Staphylococcus count was 3.1 log 10 cfu/ml. Among the isolated strains, E. coli accounted for 77% of the total isolates, followed by S. aureus (13.6%), S. saprophyticus (9.8%), Klebsiella spp. (5%), and Salmonella spp. (1.4%). Antimicrobial susceptibility analysis revealed that Gram-negative isolates were susceptible to meropenem (96.8%) and ciprofloxacin (89.9%) but were resistant to tetracycline (62.2%) and streptomycin (62.2%). Staphylococcus isolates were 95.1% susceptible to levofloxacin and gentamycin, but 92.6% of the isolates were resistant to oxacillin. Additionally, 16.6% of the Gram-negative isolates produced extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, and 30% of the S. aureus isolates were resistant to methicillin. The findings of this study demonstrate that the quality of raw milk is unsatisfactory, as it contains pathogenic microorganisms and strains that are resistant to antibiotics. These results underscore the urgent need to implement robust control measures to improve production, storage, and processing practices. Effective measures are crucial to ensure the safety and integrity of the milk supply chain and to protect public health.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Microbiology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Agronomy and Crop Science

Agronomy and Crop ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences