PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The Historic Environment Policy & Practice· 2026Q1

Partisan Mythology as Intangible Heritage: The ‘O.K. Corral’ Narrative

Anastasia Sitnina

Short summary

The 'O.K. Corral' shootout's enduring mythology was shaped by contemporaneous Republican and Democratic retellings, which framed the conflict using moral opposition but inverted its specific allegiances, establishing a narrative structure that persists today.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Early retellings of the 'O.K. Corral' event used the language of contemporary party politics.
  • Republican and Democratic accounts framed the conflict as a moral opposition between law and outlawry.
  • Crucially, opposing political traditions inverted the moral axis of this narrative structure.
  • This contemporaneous, dual framing established a persistent mythology, not a reaction to a traditional heroic myth.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This article examines the formation and persistence of the ‘O.K. Corral’ mythology as a case study in the long-term construction of historical narrative. Using newspaper accounts and court records, it argues that early retellings of the events in Tombstone, Arizona, were produced through the language of contemporary party politics. Republican and Democratic retellings both framed the conflict through a moral opposition between law and outlawry, while reversing its moral axis. These initial framings established a durable narrative structure that has persisted across subsequent retellings, from early twentieth-century accounts to recent popular media. The article highlights the role of political context in structuring the narrative models through which those events are subsequently understood. This case thereby illuminates a mechanism in the formation of a mythology: a single narrative structure, reproduced across opposing traditions through inversion of its moral axis. Consequently, this analysis disrupts the common assumption that ‘revisionist’ interpretations are produced as a reaction to a ‘traditional’ heroic myth; rather, it demonstrates that both perspectives were contemporaneous, born from the immediate partisan vocabulary of the event’s fallout.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Historic Environment Policy & Practice, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Literature and Literary Theory

Literature and Literary TheoryArts and Humanities