PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Rhetoric Review· 2026Q1

“A Rush to Judgment”: Historicizing the Emergence of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as an Islamic Counterpublic in the U.S. Public Sphere Pre-9/11

Mohammed Sakip Iddrisu

Short summary

CAIR emerged as an Islamic counterpublic in the U.S. sphere pre-9/11, using rhetorical strategies to challenge Islamophobia and construct Muslim moral identities and civic engagement.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • CAIR functioned as an Islamic counterpublic in the U.S. prior to 9/11.
  • It contested Islamophobic rhetorics that portrayed Muslims as collective threats.
  • CAIR utilized oppositional interpretations to construct Muslim ethos and moral identities.
  • Coalitional rhetoric was employed to highlight Muslims' civic engagement.
  • World-making strategies were used to advance new ways of seeing Muslims.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This article historicizes the emergence of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as an Islamic counterpublic in the U.S. public sphere prior to 9/11. The study analyzes how CAIR functioned as an Islamic counterpublic to contest entrenched Islamophobic rhetorics that positioned Muslims as collective threats to U.S. public safety. It highlights how CAIR performed counterpublic rhetorical moves by using oppositional interpretations to construct Muslim ethos and moral identities; coalitional rhetoric to highlight Muslims’ civic engagement; and world-making to advance new ways of seeing Muslims. The study provides a critical history to CAIR’s contemporary advocacy, contributing to scholarship on Islamic/Muslim counterpublicity.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Rhetoric Review, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Philosophy

PhilosophyArts and Humanities